Standing Co-founder: Dropped $100 Million Lawsuit Was ‘Frivolous’


  • Standing co-founder Carl Bennetts spoke up about why the lawsuit dropped the lawsuit, calling it frivolous.
  • Bennetts advised Decrypt he and his co-founder Jarrad Hope by no means “vanished into the fog of web obscurity,” as claimed by a plaintiff.

After a yr within the courts, a pair of New York regulation corporations has dropped their lawsuit in opposition to privacy-focused crypto community Standing. The lawsuit alleged that Standing’s co-founders have been nowhere to be discovered three years after elevating $100 million in, it additional alleged, an unlawful ICO.

Standing co-founder Carl Bennetts, who spoke to Decrypt in regards to the lawsuit for the primary time since we coated it final August, stated that the lawsuit was “frivolous,” and that it harm the fame of the corporate a lot that banks refused to work with Standing.

“Banks are extremely conservative, and so after they do due diligence on the group, they see among the media protection and that is created some hesitations,” he stated. The regulation corporations haven’t defined why they dropped the case and didn’t reply to Decrypt’s requests for remark.

The lawsuit, filed in April 2020, alleged that Bennetts and co-founder Jarrad Hope misled buyers into investing of their $100 million 2017 ICO by telling them that gross sales weren’t topic to US securities legal guidelines. Standing’s coin powers its crypto community, which includes an encrypted messaging app, crypto pockets and Web3 browser.

Final August, Standing’s attorneys advised the courtroom that the plaintiff, Joel Deutsch, purchased $35 price of STN in 2020, which he may promote for a revenue of $69. Due to this fact, “the plaintiff actually has suffered no losses of any form,” argued the attorneys.

Moreover, Bennetts alleged that Deutsch purchased the Standing tokens on a Chinese language crypto change that operated from the Polynesian island of Samoa—indirectly from Standing Community, which didn’t promote to US buyers.

Deutsch by no means responded to these claims in courtroom, and Decrypt couldn’t attain his attorneys for remark. In related circumstances, judges have concluded that crypto corporations can’t cease US buyers from accessing tokens bought in ICOs.

One other sticking level, famous in a letter to the court in August 2020, was that Deutsch’s attorneys couldn’t discover Bennetts and Hope. The co-founders, said Deutsch, had “skirt[ed] legal responsibility by vanishing into the fog of web obscurity.”

Deutsch, who additionally spoke on behalf of different (unnamed) buyers, known as the corporate’s co-founders, Bennetts and Hope, “unscrupulous actors” who sought to “benefit from American markets, customers and assets.”

However “we by no means went [anywhere],” stated Bennetts; he stated he was a resident of Thailand in 2019 and 2020, and that his attorneys have been in fixed dialog with the plaintiff’s attorneys. 

Bennetts speculated that the plaintiff’s attorneys could have been involved that Standing is included in Switzerland, and that Bennetts and Hope usually are not US residents; this might make it cumbersome for US courts to go after them, he stated.

The attorneys dropped the lawsuit on the finish of April with out citing a motive. The lawsuit in opposition to Standing was certainly one of 11 related fits filed in opposition to ICOs by regulation corporations Selendy & Homosexual PLLC and Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP. The attorneys couldn’t be reached by press time.


The views and opinions expressed by the creator are for informational functions solely and don’t represent monetary, funding, or different recommendation.

Source link